Email
kandihorsman@performex-consulting.com
Location
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Employees can’t perform as desired if they don’t possess the necessary knowledge and skills. When a needs analysis reveals a knowledge-skills gap, PERFORMEX will work with you to design and develop the most cost-effective training program solution. At the outset, PERFORMEX will engage you in the co-design of a training impact model (Brinkerhoff, 2006) which visualizes how the training program intends to transform resources and activities (i.e., means) into desired organizational results (i.e., ends).
PERFORMEX will then work with you to identify which knowledge and skills must reside in performers’ brains and those which can be captured in external memory support. For the former, performance training will be designed and developed, and for the latter, job aids. However, the creation of a program won’t stop with only what happens during training. Research demonstrates that, in the absence of post-training support and accountability, only about 10% of participants will sustain application of new learning in the workplace (Brinkerhoff, 2005).
As a result, PERFORMEX will engage you in the co-construction of a post-training support and accountability package to help training graduates sustain application of new knowledge and skills on the job in ways which contribute to targeted results. Finally, PERFORMEX will partner with you to gather data on the training program at five levels so that you can measure and report to stakeholders on how the organization’s investment in a training solution has improved performance and contributed to the achievement of desired results.
PERFORMEX uses a hybrid program logic/training impact model as a tool to visualize and to communicate how the training program (including the post-training support and accountability package) aims to transform your organization’s resources and activities (i.e., means) into desired results (i.e., ends). Specifically, as recommended by Chyung (2019), PERFORMEX adds the two means-related categories (i.e., Resources and Activities) from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation’s (2004) Program Logic Model to Brinkerhoff’s (2006) Training Impact Model. Further, for greater clarity in the third column, Brinkerhoff’s (2006) term “Capabilities” is replaced with Kirkpatrick’s (2016) term “Learning.” Finally, in the fourth column, PERFORMEX substitutes Brinkerhoff’s (2006) “Business Results” with “Organizational Results” as a more inclusive term for businesses, non-profits, and government agencies.
(Adapted from Brinkerhoff, 2006, Figure 5-1, p. 72; Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016, Table 2-1, p. 10; W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 2004, Figure 1, p. 1)
Stuffing information into people’s brains probably won’t achieve your performance goal. Even if people know something useful, that doesn’t mean they’ll do something useful. Action, not knowledge, changes business performance.
–Moore, 2013, p. 7
PERFORMEX will work with you to design and develop new asynchronous and synchronous performance training programs and improve existing programs. The primary goal of performance training (compared to awareness training) is helping employees to achieve measurable improvements in the efficiency, productivity, and/or quality of their work. PERFORMEX is committed to creating training programs which optimize participants’ engagement, deep learning, retention, commitment and confidence for on-the-job application, as well as sustained post-training behaviour change.
To accomplish this, scenario-based learning (SBL) is at the heart of PERFORMEX’s training program solutions. Scenarios immerse participants in realistic on-the-job situations where they’re challenged to make complex decisions with emotionally compelling consequences. With SBL, new learning is not only more memorable, but training graduates are also more likely to be able to successfully apply their learning when they encounter similar situations in the workplace. Further, these training stories support learners with increasing the level of expertise with which they apply new learning by providing both intrinsic and instructional feedback.
To guide the creation of efficient and effective training programs, PERFORMEX has designed a comprehensive Instructional Design Checklist by synthesizing four seminal evidence-based instructional design models, media element principles, and best practices for post-training support and accountability systems.
Performance support refers to tools and resources that help individuals perform tasks more efficiently and effectively by providing them with the necessary information and guidance in the workflow. Rossett and Schafer (2007) describe performance support as “converged information and work, residing next to the individual, in close proximity to the challenge in order to offer help when help is needed” (p. 2). Performance support tools and resources aim to enhance productivity, reduce errors, and improve overall job performance by providing timely and relevant assistance. PERFORMEX will work with you, subject matter experts, and your target audience to create performance support tools like those shown below.
For every 100 employees who participate in training programs, about 10 of them will change their job performance in any sustained and worthwhile way [in the absence of post-training support and accountability processes and systems].
Brinkerhoff, 2005, p. 88
PERFORMEX will partner with you to create a plan for reinforcing, encouraging, rewarding, and monitoring training graduates’ application of new learning on the job. To the right are the post-training support and accountability package options that PERFORMEX offers in partnership with Dr. Lori Brown for the Ready-to-Go eLearning module Trauma-Informed Teaching: De-Escalating Challenging Behaviours. To learn more about this comprehensive training program, click the button below.
PERFORMEX uses a hybrid evaluation model (aligned with the program logic/training impact model) to gather data which enable you to measure and report on the return for your organization’s training program investment. PERFORMEX adds Kirkpatrick’s (2016) Level 1: Reaction to Brinkerhoff’s (2006) Training Impact Model (TIM). This enables you to first gather data on the design of the training program itself and to then action this data to make any necessary improvements. Data gathered from Levels 2-5 (i.e., Brinkerhoff’s TIM) are focused on the outcomes of the training program. In other words, Levels 2-5 data demonstrate how participants’ learning from your training program is transformed into improved on-the-job behaviours–which in turn contribute to desired organizational results.
Extent to which participants react positively to the training program, including:
Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016
Extent to which participants acquire the following based on their participation in the training program:
Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016
Extent to which training graduates apply the *critical behaviours they learned during training when they return to their role.
*Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick (2016) define critical behaviours as the key specific, observable, and measurable actions that the target audience will have to consistently perform on the job to bring about the organization’s highest-level desired results.
Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016
Extent to which short-term outcomes (i.e., internal and external) indicate that critical actions are on track to create a positive impact on organizational goals.
Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016
Extent to which the organization’s highest-level goals occur as a result of the training program and the support and accountability package.
Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2016
Is a knowledge-skills gap holding back employees from desired performance? PERFORMEX can work with you to design and develop a new training program (or improve an existing one) that meets the unique needs of your organization.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2005). The Success Case Method: A strategic evaluation approach to increasing the value and effect of training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 86-101.
Chyung, S. Y. (2019). 10-step evaluation for training and performance improvement. Sage.
Moore, C. (2013). Training designer’s guide to saving the world: 6 steps to relevant, powerful training.
https://stevermorgan.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/training-designers-guide.pdf
Thalheimer, W. (2014, September 5). Radically improved action planning: Using cognitive triggers to support on-the-job performance. Work-Learning Research. https://www.worklearning.com/2014/09/05/triggered-action-planning/
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2006). Telling training’s story: Evaluation made simple, credible, and effective. Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. ATD.
Rossett, A., & Schafer, L. (2007). Job aids and performance support: Moving from knowledge in the classroom to knowledge everywhere. John Wiley & Sons.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). W. K. Kellogg Foundation logic model development guide. https://wkkf.issuelab.org/resource/logic-model-development-guide.html